Use Case · SAST for Startups

SAST for startups that don't have a security team yet

You're a technical founder shipping a product. You know you should be scanning your code. You've looked at Snyk and seen $25 per developer per month. You've looked at Aikido and seen $314/mo to start. You've looked at GitHub Advanced Security and worked out it'd cost you $600/mo for a team of 20.

None of these are unreasonable prices for what they offer. They're just unreasonable for where you are right now.

Kolega starts at $39/mo with better detection than any of the above. Three-minute setup. No security team required.

Pricing Reality

What “startup pricing” actually looks like

Starting price for a team of 10 engineers — the typical post-seed company.

ToolStarting price (10 engineers)What you get
Snyk$250/moPattern-matching SAST, SCA, container scanning
Aikido$314/moAggregated open-source scanners, cloud posture
Semgrep~$300+/moPattern-matching SAST with cross-file analysis
GitHub Advanced Security$490/moCodeQL SAST + secret scanning
SonarQube Cloud$32/mo+Code quality + security, scales with LOC
KolegaFrom $39/moSemantic SAST, secret detection, autofix PRs

The reason the entry tier exists at $39 is that “scan everything from day one” should be available to teams that haven't hit Series A yet. The product itself is the same as what runs in larger orgs — it's the tier you start on, with room to grow into the higher tiers as your team and codebase grow.

What's Included

What you get on the $39 tier

Included

  • Unlimited repositories
  • Up to 250k lines of code per scan
  • Semantic vulnerability detection (the same engine that scores 92.4% on RealVuln)
  • Autofix PRs
  • GitHub, GitLab, and Azure DevOps integrations
  • PR-level scanning on every commit
  • Secret detection
  • Slack notifications

On higher tiers

  • SSO
  • Custom retention policies
  • Self-hosted runners
  • Dedicated support

These sit on higher tiers when your team needs them.

The Backstory

Why “startup security” used to mean “no security”

For most early-stage companies, the security tooling story has been the same for a decade. Either you pay enterprise prices for tools built for enterprises, or you skip it and hope nothing happens.

Most teams pick the second option. They wait until they hit Series A or until a customer's security questionnaire forces the conversation. By then there's a year of unreviewed code, and the first scan returns hundreds of findings.

The reason we built Kolega flat-priced is that “scan everything from day one” should be available to any team that's serious about building real product, not just teams that can afford the enterprise tier.

Zero Setup Tax

What you don't need to figure out

No security team required

Connect a repo, scans run automatically. Findings post as PR comments. Autofix PRs handle the mechanical fixes. You don't need to hire an AppSec engineer to operate Kolega.

No CI configuration

OAuth in, choose repos, done. No YAML files to write, no GitHub Actions to maintain, no pipeline changes.

No tuning

The engine doesn't use rule libraries that need to be configured. There's no policy file to write. Default settings work for most codebases.

No long-term commitment

Monthly billing. Cancel any time. The free tier exists if you stop paying — you don't get locked out, you just drop down to scheduled scans on one app.

Honest Limits

When you'll outgrow it

The honest version. The $39 tier covers most teams up to ~25 engineers and ~250k LOC. Beyond that, you'll want:

  • Higher tier for more repositories and larger codebases
  • SSO and audit logging when your security team forms
  • Self-hosted runners when enterprise procurement asks for them
  • Custom retention when compliance frameworks require it

These are all paid tiers above $39, but the upgrade path is gradual. You don't hit a wall, you scale up to match what you actually need.

See it in 3 minutes

Connect a repo, run a scan, see what's in your code. That's the whole pitch.

No credit card required. 7-day Pro trial. Drops to a free tier afterwards.

Related Reading

Go deeper